When it is time to demonstrate to the court that your methodology is both relevant and reliable beyond mere ipse dixit (loosely translated in the legal context to mean “because I said so”), it is important to consider whether your opinion or conclusion can be reached by using a methodology that adheres to the Daubert criteria or state variations. The 4th article in my series “Admissibility of Expert Testimony: Strategies for Experts by Experts”offers suggestions for evaluating whether your methodology can meet the relevance and reliability criteria as required in FRE 702, Dabuert or state variations. Click here to read.